Thus, when deontology is applied to euthanasia, it revolves around the duty to preserve life.8 However, in other settings, deontology may go against the duty to preserve life. These people have been charged with the duty to preserve life through application of technology and modern medicine. All aspects of Kantian philosophy revolve around duty, goodwill and categorical imperative, the philosophy of pure reason.14, One should observe duties at all time despite the odds.
Robert young’s theory has little strength. Your privacy is extremely important to us. IvyPanda. For a case of euthanasia to be of moral value, the patient must request for the procedure, and the medic involved must be in a position to assess the condition of the patient and ascertain that the patient indeed suffering. "An Argument Against Euthanasia." It has also been a subject of controversy and study in the complex field of philosophy.3 While several authorities in philosophy support euthanasia through their theories, most oppose it. June 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/an-argument-against-euthanasia/. Young, Robert. Medically assisted death.
Thus, one can argue that preservation of life is not universally acceptable. Thus, while the medic performing the procedure might have goodwill, he or she might be an accessory to achieve other motives other than alleviation of pain. For this reason, it is immoral for anyone to assist any individual to die for whatever reason. For a very long time, euthanasia has been a prohibited medical practice in most countries.
It is immoral to take one’s life since such an action does not apply universally. Philosophical deontology revolves around principles of duty. Thus, euthanasia should be morally acceptable when it is done within certain defined moral guidelines that involve the authority of the subject to euthanasia. IvyPanda. If it were universally acceptable that people can take their own lives, then there would be a significant possibility that the human race would not exist. For such an action to be morally acceptable, the euthanasia should not have a beneficial effect to any other person other than the patient. Furthermore, it is the duty of the medic to prolong life regardless of the utterances and expressions of the patient. Thus, it would be immoral for one to end another person’s life for any reason. In that case, euthanasia is considered a betrayal of the person under care.13. Thus, euthanasia is performed for the sake of the suffering individual.20 While expressing his view, Young seeks to exclude instances where people kill themselves to alleviate suffering without any assistance. One can still claim that it is the ultimate aim of medical profession to alleviate pain and suffering, consequently including euthanasia as one of the profession’s duties.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. In other words, the... Euthanasia has been a controversial topic, especially over the recent years. Throughout this essay I will examine the deontological perspective on physician assisted suicide. However, Kane has postulated that the sole duty and obligation of the medical profession is to prolong life when it s possible to do so. Kant’s philosophy is a reasonable ground for the medical society to decline to practice euthanasia. Robert young’s theory may need to be refined to be accepted as a universal clinical practice.